I don’t felt like I learnt a lot. The very unusual style of the writing detracted (for me) from the actual content. Oh well.

Experimental. That’s all I can say.

The lyrics are trite, the music is unoriginal, yet it’s strangely catchy. Oh well, I’m just a sucker for weak nu-punk I guess.

This has to be one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Truly awful.

The acting was poor. The story was weak. The humor was noticeably absent.

I just don’t understand why it consistently places as one of the best comedy films of all time.

I believe the artist on this album is Dom Pachino. The album details don’t reference this in allconsuming.

I’ve got an issue with one of the fundamental premises in this book. The book asserts that the future potential business value of a company can be measured by determining a ratio between market cap (number_of_shares * share_price) and revenue (at least I think it was revenue!). And I believe this is a generally sensible and applicable approach. The rationale that is used is that investors understand a companies business model, and can see future benefit in the company, so they are willing to pay more today, for expected future returns in the company (the whole NPV of investment thing).

Now, this premise presupposes that investor actually understands and analyses the businesses model – and that is not always the case. Many investors do not perform the due diligence involved to look at business models, and often invest in industry they don’t understand, because of a “bandwagon” type effect. I can see that this effect could also be accentuated by people using momentum investing, or pure technical analysis. They would drive up prices of stocks, when a business may not have a sustainable model.

This book was written in 1997 (I think), and I wonder if the author would refine his theory if this book was written now given the .com boom and bust. Lots of business, with a high market cap, and no future earnings. Suddenly people thought “WTF are we investing for? There’s no sustainable model here?!” and the market fell over.

I’d be interested in others thoughts on this….

Good book, but I think it’s actually a bit useless unless you actually do the online test – and this requires that you are the first person to get the book. I got it out of the library at my work, and someone had already used the magic website access code :-( So, I couldn’t do the test, and consequently couldn’t understand how the majority of the book relates to me.

What I did find useful and interesting was the sections on managing people with certain strengths. I found it relatively commonsense information, but then again, most business/management books are just people writing down commonsense.

What an absolutely enchanting and beautiful movie.

I don’t know why, but I just don’t like this guys books. To me, the concepts he talks about are obvious. I believe I got more value from reading Fixing Broken Windows entry on Wikipedia and abstracting the concept out in my own mind – and that was a paragraph or two.

I also wonder if Mr. Gladwell is sponsored by big tobacco – a whole chapter dedicated to talking about how cool smokers are? Come on! hehehehe

I wholeheartedly agree with the comment that this could have been condensed down to 50 pages.

I thought this was an absolutely awful album. Just weak R’n’B style music, “thug” lyrics, decidely average beats. Didn’t enjoy it at all.