Interesting argument but terrible editing — 5 weeks ago
Many crucial typos in typesetting of logical notation! Had to reconstruct the correct notation myself.
I'm currently reading 56 books, listening to 11 albums, watching 1 movie, eating and drinking 0 food items, and consuming 2 other things.
Many crucial typos in typesetting of logical notation! Had to reconstruct the correct notation myself.
Every philosopher should read this. Creative and strong critiques of many methodological aspects of contemporary analytic philosophy.
I really detest this textbook. Gave me no understanding whatsoever. Just calculations, calculations and more calculations.
Can’t believe I finished this in 4 days. Was exhausting.
The last chapter was poorly argued and substantiated though. Thought he never really addressed the spandrel argument.
The Geroch paper on singularities in here is a beaut.
Very well-written, but what’s with all the typos??
I wish I had read this kind of thing instead of all the pop science I read as a teenager!
Just started, but love the first ten pages already.
Frankly, I didn’t find it as interesting as I hoped, because I already knew many of the ‘surprising’ results of psychological experiments described in the book. But it’s well-written and would be a great introduction to the psychology of happiness.
FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2010 Robot Co-op