People are killed in car accidents,in falls,numerous accidents but John Lennon was murdered,so why not the Murder of John Lennon as a title?
It always makes me vomit when some arty director or lefty producer presents the story of some real life murderer,terrorist of other lowlife to show his side of the story,never the victims,to help us understand how behind the appearance of a heartless murderer is a misunderstood human being,I don’t care what about the victim?
So I was very wary of this,how can you not glamourise the main character?How can you not make us feel sympathy for this murderer?
The film manages to show a Chapman who while believable provokes no sympathy,beyond that you would show to anyone who has ruined their own lives.This is why, I believe, the brutal images of the murder of Lennon are acceptable,that is what Chapman did to Lennon and don’t forget it if you ever think he should be paroled.