A review of "Missing Sarah: A Vancouver Woman Remembers Her Vanished Sister" — 2 years ago
I sort of suspected this would be the case when I picked up this book, but I was determined to press on. It’s an important book on a very interesting and important subject – the missing women of Vancouver’s DTES, in particular Sarah de Vries, the author’s sister – but it is terribly written. Kind of like that last sentence. She gets all the information out by putting one foot in front of the other, from childhood until Sarah’s death with occasional interjections of emotion or family fluff.
It’s an autobiography, I know, so there is a need for some of those bits, but I think the problem here is that this is her sister and she maybe didn’t spend as much time with her while she was alive as she wanted to, so now she is writing a book and she is putting absolutely everything in it. That Christmas that Sarah said something funny. That story she wrote that was about death…everything becomes “important” because it’s all that’s left, and while that’s fine for a family history, it doesn’t make a very interesting narrative.
I am sad to say anything negative about this book because I live only a few blocks away from the DTES. I am obsessed with society’s negligence in dealing with the missing women and now that the Pickton trial has started I want this information to be available to everyone. I want to buy a copy of this book and give it to everyone I know, except it would be a symbolic gesture because it truly is not well written at all. A shame.





