“How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.
I love thee to the depth and breadth and height
My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight
For the ends of Being and ideal Grace.
I love thee to the level of everyday’s
Most quiet need, by sun and candle-light.
I love thee freely, as men strive for Right;
I love thee purely, as they turn from Praise.
I love thee with a passion put to use
In my old griefs, and with my childhood’s faith.
I love thee with a love I seemed to lose
With my lost saints, - I love thee with the breath,
Smiles, tears, of all my life! - and, if God choose,
I shall but love thee better after death.”
ELISABETH BARRETT BROWNING (1806-1861)
How does anyone interpret poetry? In this spectacular example of a writers passion for the art and craft of communicating through the written word, there is an inexplicable passion for life, love, freedom, joy, and liberty contained on one neat and tidy little page.
As philosophical inquiry into the anatomy of a human soul, and as simple poetic literature, I could read Barrett’s works [especially] more than a thousand times over. In doing so, I don’t believe that I could fathom a 10th of her passion and meaning.
Poetry, like any true masterpiece works of art, will always and perpetually take me “forever” to fininsh consuming, because with each new breath and each new day they provide more and more intensity of meaning. How many questions about the nature of the world, life, and true meaning spring forth to the forefront path of the mind’s eye when encountering such a timeless work?
If the soul is true, then how much free will and destiny paths intertwine with each successive incarnation or appearance of reality… and how much deeper is the meaning of knowing the differences between “I and Thou”? What is real-and can the heart be contained by the erasure of time? Are time and space real? How much of us exists in the here and now and what continues on in the spirit and essence of the divine? What is love… and indulgence or the willingness to embrace purity of affection that transcends practical natures? Post mortum, what of us lives-or fails to live—on throughout the ages with a sense of sentimentality?
In pondering truth, one embraces life’s purest and most essential meanings. Ahhhh, or to take the opposite perspective one could say that the metaphysics of the contemplation or the mortal coil is just all just smoke and mirrors, hoopla, horse poop, and gobbledy-goo. ;) What difference is this true love poetry to me or you, as existential beings? I and thou, us and them, it all has the ability to provide one with the xenophobic foundation of the position of “other”, which in all reality is probably an illusion anyhow says the more prudent side of the philosophers stone. What one embraces is the here and now, without conscience, without contemplation, and as a mere expression of a carnal ID, grasping in the full Freudian sense the concept of impulse and need. Therefore, Ms. Barrett may have life entirely wrong, and be wasting her time hoping in vain that there is some substance to her own self-improvised reality. Could that be why I like her work-for the grand delusion of it all, embraced so passionately and with such reckless abandon?
Perhaps I just like all the pretty words. ;-) [I’ll leave those decisions up to the reader.]
Whatever your opinion, Ms. Barrett seems to support that the truth of any matter is always up to the approval and blessings of God. For that simple assertion of a willingness to show the humbleness and humility of character, I am impressed with her historically. Combining high spirit with a willingness to sublimate desire as bending to the will of the creator, Mrs. Browning displays both elegance and eternal lady grace. As writer and woman, she was remarkable, and one can unconditionally recommend a thorough read of all her work. Enduring what was a physically challenging life, albeit a life of luxury, perhaps drove her to explore her own psyche more and more deeply; with the tool of the pen, she crafted articles of faith for romance generations, making her immortal in her words and deeds despite any physical ailings. If spirit does continue to live on, then, via memory and culture, she is as timeless and relevant today as she was vital during the 1800’s.
Now him… Browning… everything he says is a different story. Is he genuine, AUTHENTIC, believable? Or does he use words crafted like points of arrows, seeking out their target; words he makes with the same precision of carefully chiseling stone-for effect but potentially without meaning or substance, and exist purely as subterfuge to hide and camoflauge his own flawed and perpetually selfish essence? Did he marry for money, for notariety, for connections-or was it love? Either way, it does not matter, as he was her icon, a rock of truth—and she died peacefully in his arms like any proper lady with a devoted and proper fondness for a gentleman would choose to do.
To those innoquous questions, I will also quite innocently leave the discovery up to the reader. As such, and without accepting the responsibility for causing ripples in the waters of more paranoid imaginations, I’ll leave my written analysis of the male psyche to another day. Time today to move on to more meetings about where the sidewalk ends with my true loves and family. I have accomplished my goal of “writing something every day” today, and with that, in the poetic words of Shel Silverstein, I’ll say, “Goodbye, I’m going out to play.”