I’m hearing a lot of people panning this film and I have to say I don’t think they really understand just what the hell zombie films are about.
They’re not horror movies. The creeping fear that a good horror movie needs to sustain for 90-120 minutes just cannot be present in a good zombie film. Once the zombies have been understood, they’re not scary. Zombies films are about man vs nature, a peculair nature, true, but they’re not evil. The zombies serve to make men react, not proact. You can’t be proactive against zombies.
What makes Land of the Dead good as I see it is the internal consistency and nuance that Romero built into the film. It’s a world where you can believe the situation (assuming the basic buy that the dead have come back to life and have a taste for the flesh of the living). One nice thing is the gradual arc that Romero’s built between Day of the Dead and this film play on Zombie’s gaining basic reasoning skills. Bub and Big Daddy were both played charismatically and minimally, sharing a lot of the same traits that make Frankenstein’s monster (from the films mind you, not the book) sympathetic.
I think the biggest reason why so many people are dissapointed is that they walk in looking for a summer popcorn movie and get something much more intricate and complicated. A lot of the movie is played out in the subtext and despite complaints to the contrary, the film is better for it.