All Consuming


264 out of 302 people (87%) think this is worth consuming…

0143037749

16 people are consuming this.


See all 16 people consuming this

481 people have consumed this.


See all 481 people who have consumed this

6 entries have been written about this.

Inditra
Seattle

A story about this — 1 year ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

I think the problem with Zadie Smith is that she got too popular too soon. She became a literary darling before she had time to really refine her style, so to me her books come off raw, but not in a good way. I think if she had been left alone for a few more years it might have given her some time to refine her style.

That being said this was a good book. Not a great book, but a good one, although I think she needs to spend some more time in America to learn how Americans speak. A lot of times while reading this book I found myself thinking, “Is this how people in Britain think we talk?”

Katie
Cambridge

A story about this — 2 years ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

Up to CD #3/16.

octobergold
Dublin

A story about this — 2 years ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

i loved this book!

bartzturkeymom
Seattle

On Beauty by Zadie Smith — 2 years ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

“If you ask me what I have come to do in this world…I will reply: I’m here to live my life out loud.”
Emile Zola

I often participate in book rings where a group of people read the same book one after the other, leaving journal comments about the book and passing it on to the next person. One such book that I recently read was “On Beauty” by Zadie Smith. It won the Orange Prize for Fiction in 2006 and was shortlisted for the Man Booker Prize in 2005. I kept seeing the title on all the lists of books one must read so I signed on to the book ring.

Smith is from North London and “On Beauty”is her third novel. Despite the fact that I disagreed with many of the review blurbs in the front of the book, I loved it and will treasure it. I did not find it to be at all comedic as a number of the reviewers quoted, instead finding it to be an incisively tragic look into the state of families.

The story of “On Beauty” takes place in New England at a small college outside of Boston. Montague (Monty) Kipps and Howard (Howie) Belsey are both professors, both have written (or are writing) books on Rembrandt, both have lived in London, both have strong black wives and several college aged children, and both have cheated on their wives.

That’s where the similarities end and the entanglements begin. Though they each are enamored of studying Rembrandt, Kipps loves him and Belsey loathes him and all representational art. Belsey and his non-religious, extremely liberal, feminist, affirmative-action loving family are having a hard time communicating and often seem to explode apart from each other at the family home which they inherited from Belsey’s wife’s mother and moved to from London ten years earlier. Kipps and his conservative, devoted church-going family on the other hand collect Caribbean artwork, are affirmative-action haters, and so devoted to each other and the idea of family as to almost suffocate each other with their closeness. At a point when the two men are virtually career rivals, Kipps is invited to join the faculty of Wellington College. At least he and Belsey are in two different departments. Kipps is in the African Studies department and Belsey is in the Humanities department teaching esoteric art history courses that all the students would like to take but decide not to when it comes down to the wire. The College has proposed a series of lectures by the two that highlight their differences of opinion. Oh, and by the way, though this may seem small to some of us, Belsey is the only white member of his family and until the Kippses arrived, his family were one of few black families in a sea of white.

Before the Kippses moved to the Boston suburb, they were firmly ensconced in a poor neighborhood in London where he ran his Christian charities for the benefit of the poor in the Caribbean from where he and his wife Carlene came—he from Trinidad, she from another, smaller island. Jerome Belsey (the eldest of the Belsey children) took an internship with him and when he got into a spot of financial trouble the Kippses took him in where he fell in love with everything about them including their familial closeness, their religion, and their daughter Victoria. Howard was outraged that Jerome planned to end the feud between the fathers ala Romeo and Juliet and flew to London to retrieve his son. Unfortunately, Vee had already broken Jerome’s heart and thrown another log on the fire of the Kipps/Belsey conflagration.

After the Kippses move in down the street, Carlene and Howard’s wife Kiki become, as they put it “shelters from the storm” for each other, Howard is seduced by Monty’s “daddy-issues” daughter Victoria, and Vee becomes an academic rival of Howard’s daughter, Zora. And those are just the highlights. Every time one of the characters does something loving for another sibling, child or parent, it is offset by them doing something equally unloving to one of the others. In the end they are all confronted by having to see themselves in the mirror of their family and forced to grow up. My heart strings were so raveled by the end of this novel that I simply ached.

Smith’s insight into families, colleges, race relations, and teenagers was spot on and the dialog, plot and characters were genuine in all respects.

rhia
Halifax

I have a quibble with this... or several. — 2 years ago

NOT WORTH CONSUMING

I guess the first thing I have to say about this book is that right from the first few pages I started detailing a list of quibbles I had with it. (I’ll reproduce this at the bottom of the review.)

I wanted to like it, I did. It showed a promise in the first few pages that I hoped it would finally catch up to. But in the end I just didn’t like any of the characters, didn’t particularly believe any of the characters, and failed to get embroiled in the plot, such as it was. I was REALLY disappointed.

And I think this was a bestseller? SO ODD. Maybe I just can’t read properly anymore…

With that, quibbles:

- Character names (Levi for a half-black boy? I was fairly confused because I was expecting Jewish, if that makes sense.) Minor quibble. (I didn’t like several of the other names, either)
- Consistent use of the said+adverb construction (denotes lazy writing, telling, not showing, etc. and is very distracting if it happens several sentences running.)
- Inconsistencies (minor, but yes, distracting.)
- Someone says “I’m very memorizing.”
- Coy references to September 11th.
- Constant self-conscious references to race
- Some characters talk in phoneticaly spelled dialect – but not everything they say. See “Pah-point” for Power Point out of a character who speaks with this sort of southern accent on some words only, and a bus driver who says something in a “Pahk the cah in haaahhvahhd yahhhd” accent, which is then explained, twice.
- Strange and improbable verbs
- Americans use British phrasing.
- It refers to Salon.com publishing poetry (not when I used to read it!)

Yeaaaaaaaaaaah. Anyway.

riceandsoup
Singapore

A review of this — 3 years ago

I wonder how many times you can repeat a successful formula when it comes to writing novels. Of all Smith’s books, I think White Teeth is the best so far.


FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2009 Robot Co-op