All Consuming


69 out of 109 people (63%) think this is worth consuming…

B00005jojf

228 people have consumed this.


See all 228 people who have consumed this

6 entries have been written about this.

A story about this — 3 years ago

A very bleak movie but Johnny Depp’s performance was amazing. I wouldn’t say this movie is worth watching but I liked it, strangely enough.

mofo269
Chicago

didn't know what to think — 3 years ago

NOT WORTH CONSUMING

while watching this movie, i didn’t know if i was supposed to laugh or be offended. i just didn’t get it. i usually love period films. this one had some very dark photography. the characters were confusing.

faerietaleslie
Covington

A story about this — 3 years ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

the first time, it was worth consuming
the second time, i couldnt get through it.
i like the story, i do not like the movie. and i had forgotten how vulgar it can be.
oh well.

faerietaleslie
Covington

A story about this — 3 years ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

the first time, it was worth consuming
the second time, i couldnt get through it.
i like the story, i do not like the movie. and i had forgotten how vulgar it can be.
oh well.

nutsywb
Fairfax

Why I recommend this — 3 years ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

He starts in the very beginning saying you won’t like him, explaining that he’s lewd, lecivious, lecherous and all kinds of other nasty things. I was expecting a little more fun, more happy fun. Really it’s a study in how depravity and total lack of concience can ruin a life, even one as talented and brilliant as the Second Earl of Rochester.

Even so, I thoroughly enjoyed that study. And I didn’t shed a tear for him, as was the director’s hope, I think.

Ok, so I also went to watch Johnny Depp prancing around in a period peice for an hour and a half, and I got precisly that.

Jacob Harris
New York City

A review of this — 3 years ago

NOT WORTH CONSUMING

Tertiary Syphilis == not a date movie.


FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2009 Robot Co-op