I’ve read several of his books. He is an easy to read writer for the most part, and an interesting thinker. I think some holes can be torn in most of his theories but they are still interesting to think about. I like how he integrates so many fields.

This one is particularly easy to read because it is in essay form. Since they were reprints of New Yorker articles, they stretched over time too. It would be interesting to talk with him about how some of his thinking on some of the older articles has changed over that time. And I suppose that is really the thing with his writing — he seems like he would be easy and interesting to talk with.