All Consuming


127 out of 197 people (64%) think this is worth consuming…

51wq0r12fkl

2 people are consuming this.

503 people have consumed this.


See all 503 people who have consumed this

People consuming this are also consuming these items.

4 entries have been written about this.

Failure in challenging Tarkovsky — 2 years ago

NOT WORTH CONSUMING

The main aim behind this bad movie, in my opinion, was challenging Tarkovsky adaption of the masterpiece by Lem. Even more than 3 decades later, Soderbergh clearly failed to acquire those aspects of the novel which was well adapted in Tarkovsky movie. A total failure for Soderbergh. After watching Kafka by him, I thought he is wise in literary adaption. Guess I was wrong…

starry_sky
Ontario

A story about this — 2 years ago

NOT WORTH CONSUMING

The idea was good but the movie was just so slow that my friend and I danced when it was over in the theatre. Not one of George Clooney’s better movies. Keep your feet on the ground George.

Hamish Rickerby
Reading

A story about this — 3 years ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

I love the empty feeling that space movies often have. This movie seemed very similar to 2001 in that respect. Good stuff. And, of course I love the clean, minimalist, stark interior design of the future.

Good movie, now I want to see the original.

prayformojo
Madrid

A story about this — 4 years ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

This gets a bad rap when it’s compared to Tarkovsky’s original adaptation. However, I’ve seen both versions and read the book and I think that they all have something to offer. Soderbergh’s version ponders the same themes as Tarkovsky’s, but from a more emotional, as opposed to psychological, viewpoint. Approach this with an open mind. Soderbergh is a very talented filmmaker.


FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2009 Robot Co-op