psh. this movie shows the sexual tensions perfectly. you guys don’t know what your talking about. sure nicole kidman is naked for probably a full hour just staring at her self in the mirror. but hey you’ve never seen that in another movie have you? huh? huh? haha. i still like it.

I’ll admit the movie has its problems, but I’m a fan of ambiguity. This movie had plenty of that, so it edged me over to deciding it was worth it.

That’s three hours of my life I’ll never get back.

I hate Tom Cruise. Watching him in this movie made me want to poke my eyes out. “It must get better…” I thought while watching. “It’s Kubrick- don’t give up. There will be a payoff at the end.” Wrong! If you want to watch it, take some drugs or lick a frog or something, anything to keep yourself entertained. I’d recommend doing a shot every time Cruise tries too hard to act, but you’d die of alcohol poisoning.

Why would you set a film a New York and then film it in London? New York streets just don’t look like that . . . and that tagged US mailbox that kept following Cruise around . . . that was really creepy.

Also, Cruise doesn’t tell Domino his name, but she calls him by it and Nightengale doesn’t tell Cruise exactly what to buy for the orgy, but he knows . . . continuity problems, or part of the ‘is it a dream?’ effect?

Watched this to commemorate Cruise’s censorship of Katie Holmes love scenes . . .

There’s $7 and 159 minutes I will never get back.