Inland Empire (2pc) (Amar) on All Consuming

66 out of 78 people (84%) think this is worth consuming…

Inland Empire (2pc) (Amar)
→ See this at Amazon.com

4 people are consuming this.

BGGirlinUS

in Davis
OhMyTrill

in Houston
shanti

in Minneapolis
Rachel

in Baltimore

211 people have consumed this.

→ See all 211 people who have consumed this

This item is on the following Lists of Bests lists

2 entries have been written about this.

ladycady

Surreal confusionism abounds in the movie "Inland Empire" — 1 year ago

NOT WORTH CONSUMING

A very confusing movie! I would start to catch onto some of the story for about 10-20 minutes, then I would be lost again. Laura Dern’s conversation with her new neighbor was both stilted and confusing. The woman claimed to be introducing herself to her new neighbors. Then she would go on a prophetic bent or start a story – and bounce between everything.

I think I spent most of the movie with a confused “what the” expression on my face.

Add a comment

Chris Campbell
Wolfville

A review of this — 1 year ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

It took about 30 or 40 minutes for it to start working for me, but then it clicked and I was absorbed into the strange, dreamlike world that David Lynch creates with Inland Empire. Confusing at first, but then the dream logic started to make sense, but just like a dream, it can sound pretty incoherent when you start to describe it to someone. The film is shot on digital video and is built around Laura Dern who plays an actress in a film that is apparently a remake of a film of a Polish story that is cursed. But that doesn’t even scratch the surface and it’s not very plot-oriented, but it’s hauntingly familiar in some ways and it actually seemed simpler to understand than Lynch’s previous film, Mulholland Drive.
The film loops around and folds in upon itself which makes it hard sometimes to tell where something ends or begins. As Laura Dern’s character says at one point:

It’s a story that happened yesterday, but I know it’s tomorrow.

3 comments