A story about this — 46 weeks ago
I found this book emotionally moving and thought-provoking. I liked how John reflected on his relationship with his father and his father’s relationship with his father.
175 out of 197 people (88%) think this is worth consuming…
I found this book emotionally moving and thought-provoking. I liked how John reflected on his relationship with his father and his father’s relationship with his father.
This book leaves me a bit speechless. Beautiful. I never re-read books but if I ever start, this is the one I’ll pick up first.
I was surprised some at how much I enjoyed this book. Because it is an epistolary novel consisting of only one, long letter from a 77 year old minister to his seven year old son, I thought it would be boring. It was certainly different from any contemporary books I’ve read, but it wasn’t boring at all.
In his letter, the father writes about his own youth and his relationship with his father, his scallywag of a grandfather, his best friend and that man’s ne’er-do-well son, the history of his Iowa town as a stop on the Underground Railroad during the Civil War, and his two marriages. Throughout, he ties in the themes of grace, forgiveness, and man’s fallibility.
I was particularly struck by the narrator’s discussions on how much he enjoyed his life. He writes the letter to his son knowing that he will not be around when his son is an adult. But, although he is approaching death and anticipating his heavenly afterlife, he makes it clear that he appreciated the temporal pleasures of his life — the beauty of the prairie, his books and education, falling in love, baseball, and his town.
It was wonderful.
A variation of this review is posted on Rose City Reader.
This book wasn’t my thing. It’s apparently a Pulitzer prize winning book, but I found it a long read. It is told from the point of view of an old minister writing a letter to his young son about his life, with long periods of tangent. It’s nicely written and has some interesting characters, but nothing happens and it progresses quite slowly.
I found this to be a very quiet, truthful novel. It’s a story about a father and a son, or perhaps a father and his father and a son, or perhaps the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost. But it’s also about love.
The book is written as a letter, or a series of letters left behind by a reverand reaching eighty for his seven-year old son. There are many times when he seems to be quietly apologetic for ‘just not expecting’ him. There are so many things he wishes he could grow up with him and show him, so many quiet beauties in the world he wants his son to share. The way water shakes off leaves or dresses, the way afternoon light settles gently on tables…
And it is also a story about forgiveness. This novel came quite unexpectedly to me as an airport book (an instinct I always trust; I am convinced that any book I pick up in an airport will be worth reading). I gave a copy to my own father, and I cannot recommend it highly enough.
It is sweet like a the kiss of a child.
Don’t get me wrong, this is a beautiful book. I definitely understand how it won the Pulitzer. However, it’s a tedious read. It’s very stream of consciousness; it isn’t divided into chapters, which I found frustrating. Religion plays a very heavy part in it, which is why it really wasn’t my cup of tea.
FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Send Us Feedback | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2012 Robot Co-op