All Consuming


ShipwreckMazuma
Minnesota

A story about this — 10 weeks ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

Marlowe is a private investigator. Usually when one thinks of somebody as being a P.I., they assume it has to do with mercenary values – if not, then why aren’t these individuals cops? Maybe Marlowe doesn’t think he’d be able to get the same results as a cop; having to go through all the bureaucracy might give him the idea that too little good can be done that way, and what is done is in often cases too slow to aid the victim. He might know this first-hand as well, given that he’d apparently been one at some point in his past.

Marlowe appears to have a fairly strict personal code of honor. He doesn’t immediately accept Sternwood’s offer out of hand, and actually attempts to get the general to help himself by paying off the blackmailer to begin with, which would do nothing in the ways of adding to Marlowe’s bankbook – just a little free advise to an old guy that he decides that he likes. He also refuses to divulge any details about his case with anybody until he feels that the questions no longer have any significance, and would be more dangerous civically and to his client in Not answering – like when he goes to his friend/past coworker Ohls to let him know what’s what so far and square him up with Wilde and the cops once the bodies start piling up. He also never takes advantage of a woman when he has clear opportunities to do so, even when the woman in question – Miss Carmen Sternwood – clearly wouldn’t mind his attentions, (Geiger’s house, Marlowe’s room). After the literal sense of the case appears to be buttoned up, he continues on with the loose ends that he feels is the General’s actual interests in the matter, simply because he feels a sort of kinship and duty toward the man and doesn’t like the idea of the man’s last days (Sternwood is Clearly unwell) being any worse than they need to be.

Very little is known about Marlowe’s past; perhaps this is given in more detail in one of Chandler’s other novels. We know he’s been around the block a few times though, and knows how to take care of himself. He also knows his limits. When the hitman, Canino, is mentioned, Marlowe shows some signs of genuine concern – hitmen are scary, and Marlowe knows this well – he takes Canino very seriously.

Aspects of the anti-hero in Marlowe were not very easy for me to find. This is most likely due to the fact that growing up with so many anti-heroes in the comic books has clouded my judgment and made me cynical of anybody who calls themself or is dubbed “hero”. In any case, Marlowe is hard for me to pin down. He’s honest – he won’t accept a bribe, work for somebody shady, or try to fool himself when he knows he smells a rat. He doesn’t like lying or being lied to. The one thing I know that bugged me for a little bit about his morals is how he’d allow a situation to progress past the point of it moving into the questionable or illegal without him doing or saying anything to stop it, until he ultimately confronts the issue once it’s on the table and takes it apart – showing the person that he knows the sham of it all and that he doesn’t accept it. This happens when either of the Sternwood women would start lying (Regan with the fake mugger and in the car, Carmen in almost every scene she takes part in), and in other places with Mars, or Brody in his apartment before he gets shot. I thought at these times – though it would likely hurt the story – that if he were so “painfully” honest, why would he let people hang themselves like this without stopping them first when he could? Was that dark mental sadism some kind of anti-hero aspect? Then I remembered a story of one of the Pandava from the Indian epic The Mahabharata. Yudhishthira was involved in a game of dice where he was losing right and left. He was gambling and losing Everything, literally; his riches, his estates, his servants, and ultimately his freedom and the freedom of his brothers and wife until finally Everything was gone. After being given back his freedom by his uncle – the current king – he is challenged to one final game of dice. He knows that there is more than a good chance that the guy he’s playing against is constantly cheating. He knows also that to lose in this game will have far-reaching and devastating consequences for everybody throughout the kingdoms. He accepts the challenge, and it drives his brothers crazy. “What is your problem?? What are you doing? You have no right to do this! Have you lost your senses?” Yudhishthira is the son (or, A son) of Dharma. Dharma is the universal law of right action, or doing the right thing – always. Not the right thing as far as necessarily following man or god’s laws, but the right thing on a Very refined level that takes yogis dedicated to understanding dharma years to understand. He tells his brothers that he must dice with this man. To refuse to dice with him would be to deny the man the opportunity to Not cheat. he needs to give the man the chance to make the right choice, or in short – to be good. Maybe that’s what Marlowe does. Maybe he wants to see people make the right choice on their own, because anything less would be a lie and lessen both of them.

Comments

ShipwreckMazuma
Minnesota

Family plays a part in here too

There’s a phrase, blood is thicker than water. That may be true, but so are oil and feces and many many other substances. My absolute loyalty extends to my kids and wife, everybody/thing else being conditional. At this point in my life conditions exist that find me closer to my father and brother. The latter I do not fully understand; we have a mutual bond somehow that puts us at each other’s very rare service nearly without question regardless of how hot or cool we’ve been toward each other in intervening weeks, months, or years. It’s almost as if the two of us inhabit the same fragile bubble, and view the world together from different angles – facing outward away from each other. We’re very similar, but extremely different in ways that are not immediately evident to an outsider; perhaps the cliché two sides of the same coin could be applied.I would not allow this attachment to interfere with my kids or wife, however. I love them fiercely. This is the very first time I’ve ever looked straight at this link or whatever with my brother, and attempt to analyze it in any way.

I’ve two sisters and a mother, as well as a few cousins; but honestly, they can join the ranks of conditional treatment or assistance or whatever that I would assign to friends, acquaintances, and outsiders. I’m always willing to listen and help with little things, but I usually don’t get invested unless I can feel people, and I usually just don’t seem to be able to do that as easily as I used to anymore. Everything has to be earned, subject to my own personal (subconscious?) criteria. I think I either have an issue with trust or am maybe internally emotionally selfish. Who knows. Cleaving yourself to another’s life subjects you to the same trials and tribulations of that individual. I don’t see any point of honor being gained by championing or being railroaded into a cause that you don’t believe in. [CAUSE = person(other) + incident(usually a problem moral or otherwise)]

General Sternwood continues to hold in himself a position of responsibility and protection towards his daughters. His daughters know this, and have no problem taking advantage of his love; they constantly allow him or his agents to clean up the messes they tend to leave. I don’t know that the absence of a mother makes much of a difference one way or the other within the adult lives of Vivian and Carmen. The whole lot looks to me as though the Sternwood structure is supposed to appear as the bare bones of how Chandler portrays family in this novel – one benevolent patriarch chained of his own volition to the repercussions of his charge’s antics.

We don’t know anything about Marlowe’s family, because he doesn’t share anything with us. We know he’s alone; perhaps he mirrors Chandler in this. Chandler himself could definitely hold the idea of family suspect. His religious parents divorced when he was 7, his mother taking him from Chicago to England to live within a strict Victorian household. He seems to have had a deep desire to get out on his own, as he left to study abroad in Europe at his first opportunity. Later, after borrowing money from an uncle, “Every penny was repaid, with six per cent interest…,” (Chandler, The Big Sleep & Farewell My Love, p. v) he moved to America where he met his wife. Other than the great love and devotion he held for his wife, Chandler hadn’t much use for any of his others in his family.

I think most people have a great appreciation for their families, and hold them as deeply and personally important. We all also see images of this in television sit-coms and commercial. However, I believe the media veneer of family to be an image that is foisted on us in order to convince everybody that everything’s alright here in America – Be happy, DON’T PANIC, and go back to sleep – we have everything under control. Regardless of what we all feel for our families or whatever influence (great or small) the mass media has over our perceptions of the word, our minds have the final say in the matter. The Sternwood family is a reflection – notably a negative one – of our inherent individualism within a family in thought, word, and deed that America engenders. We each have our own freedom of choice that can be exercised as it pertains to our perceptions of the world around us, and what it means to us. This individualism often easily leads to a lazy and/or personal philosophy to present itself. This negative side of human individualism is what we see in the family structure within The Big Sleep.


ShipwreckMazuma has received 2 cheers on this entry

  • MFM cheered this 2 weeks ago
  • Stephen cheered this 3 weeks ago

FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2009 Robot Co-op