All Consuming


Emily has consumed…

Dirty Harry

Emily
Houston

A story about this — 43 weeks ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

Frank Sinatra was originally cast to play Harry, but because of a prior wrist injury, he couldn’t hold up the Magnum.

John Wayne, Paul Newman, and Steve McQueen were all approached next, and they all turned down the role.

It turned out well for Clint Eastwood, because after The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly, this is kind of his defining role, not to mention the quintessential 70’s movie. It’s very anti-establishment, and it really pushes the envelope with nudity and violence.

Comments

NYCinephile
New York City

Wow!

I never knew who else had been considered for the part. Thanks for sharing!

What’s prompted you to explore the films of the seventies?

Emily
Houston

I’m currently taking this fabulous class that centers on the films being made in the climate of Hollywood in the 70’s, after the establishment of the ratings system and the advent of film schools.

I’ll keep posting entries like this as the class continues. Wednesday night we’re watching The French Connection, which I’ve never particularly enjoyed to be completely honest.

NYCinephile
New York City

Sounds like a great class!

Are you reading Peter Biskin’s Easy Riders…. book?

Emily
Houston

Nope…is it good?

calypte
Edinburgh

cool

Who could now imagine anyone else apart from Clint in the role

NYCinephile
New York City

Yes. I think it's regarded as a modern primer...

...on Scorcese, DePalma, Ashby and others who “cut their teeth” in the ‘70s.

It’ll also give you a peek into Hollywood’s decadence during that period.

On a related note, have you seen the quasi-documentary The Kid Stays in the Picture?

Chris Campbell
Wolfville

I love The Kid Stays in the Picture. Robert Evans is such a larger-than-life character.
Why do you think it’s a quasi-documentary?

NYCinephile
New York City

I'm not quite sure. Perhaps because of the artistic...

...and visually arresting sequences that tie certain segments together.

I now see you taking your new glasses off, stroking your beard and scolding me in front of your “Introduction to the Documentary Tradition” class. :)

Chris Campbell
Wolfville

It’s interesting how there is a certain expectation for a documentary film and the parameters that it operates within. I really love a film that challenges the assumptions about documentary and takes a more artistic approach. Many documentaries are far too literal and there are many ways to show a deeper less-literal truth.
(Unfortunately I don’t have my new glasses yet, so I can’t take them off.)
I’d never scold you… this is what we call a “teachable moment” and a chance to start discussion. I love those moments because they are a chance to bring different opinions and insight in. But you already know that since you invariable start all sorts of great discussion out with your comments.

NYCinephile
New York City

I think that you'd make a great guest Member...

...at a future gathering of the New York Cinephiles Meetup! :)

Chris Campbell
Wolfville

If I’m in New York and there is a Cinephiles Meetup, I’ll be there!

NYCinephile
New York City

You can be assured...

...that I’ll schedule a Meetup based on your visit. :)

Chris Campbell
Wolfville

You are too kind.

Chris Campbell
Wolfville

Ok. I found it… (I love the internet) this is from a lecture filmmaker Errol Morris gave at Harvard about non-fiction filmmaking and style and truth:

The first film I made, Gates of Heaven, was very much in reaction to a prevailing idea about how documentaries should be made. Namely, the idea of cinema verite, truth cinema. There was this idea that if you follow certain rules, if you shoot things in a certain way, then out pops the truth. [...] You put in the appropriate ingredients, and magically, truth results.
[...]
To me, it’s utter nonsense. Who could have ever made such a claim? On the basis of what? Does the font you use to print a sentence guarantee its truth or falsity? I think not. All of us get comfort – I can’t speak for all of us, but my guess is the preponderant number of people in this room get a certain comfort from reading The New York Times. It’s that familiar set of fonts that we’re used to seeing every day, fonts which give us a certain level of comfort, a belief that what we’re reading is true. I would submit that style doesn’t guarantee truth. How could it possibly ever do such a thing? We may feel that the fonts are truth-telling fonts, but it’s our uncritical reliance on a whole constellation of beliefs.

Now I have to write some reviews of recent films I’ve seen… you’ve got me thinking about this stuff.

Chris Campbell
Wolfville

Dirty Harry was directed by Don Siegel who directed Eastwood in the odd film The Beguiled in 1971 as well. Siegel also directed the original Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

Emily
Houston

God, we're all movie nerds. It's so great.

Don Siegel is the reason Eastwood got his chance to direct his first movie, Play Misty for Me, in which he also plays a bartender.

Chris Campbell
Wolfville

It is great to have fellow movie nerds to share this important information with!

It’s great that Eastwood got the chance to direct as it’s a whole other side to his career that is fascinating and different from many of his acting roles.


Emily has received 4 cheers on this entry


FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2008 Robot Co-op