A story about this — 3 years ago
NOT WORTH CONSUMING
No matter how much I like Zelazny, I didn’t really like this book. Too many religious and philosophical questions in there for my taste (so call me shallow). It felt more like a sophisticated (or should I say SCIFIsticated) debate than a real novel. Zelazny and Dick wrote it masterfully, did good job with the characters and all, but I prefer a story for the sake of story itself rather than stories that serve for proving or exploring a point. Not my cup of tea.


Comments
sipes23
Crystal Lake
PKD
Yeah, I agree with your point. Sometimes all that you really want is story for its own sake.
Philip K. Dick doesn’t do that. Well, maybe a litte, but there’s usually some bigger point he’s making. I suspect that’s his influence on the book coming through.